From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 23 05:42:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CF216A4CE; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 05:42:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEC843D54; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 05:42:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.rr.com [65.184.201.54]) iAN5fv4R012099; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:41:57 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41A2CE30.2000900@ec.rr.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:44:16 -0500 From: jason User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041025) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= References: <16798.12075.465147.307112@canoe.dclg.ca> <864qjixdpi.wl%sf@FreeBSD.org> <41A1FB7D.9000308@jonny.eng.br> In-Reply-To: <41A1FB7D.9000308@jonny.eng.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: FUJISHIMA Satsuki cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: David Gilbert Subject: Re: List of fake vs. real SATA drives. X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 05:42:03 -0000 João Carlos Mendes Luís wrote: > What is the practical diference? Performance? > > FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote: > >> Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are: >> Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8 >> Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII >> Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch) >> Any other drives (as far as I know, of course) are ATA drive with >> serial-parallel bridge. >> >> At Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:36:43 -0500, >> David Gilbert wrote: >> >>> Is there anyone compiling a list of "fake" vs. "real" SATA drives? >>> The difference being "fake" drives with ATA-100 electronics and an >>> SATA to ATA conversion chip vs. drives that really support SATA >>> natively? >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > The practical difference is higher I/Os, better server(database) performance, worse general home user single thread app performance. You would not want to get ant command queing if all you do is play doom3 or other desktop stuff. If you are running a home server you get scsi like performance for ide prices.