Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 10:06:31 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: rhh@ct.picker.com (Randall Hopper) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: workman-atapi port - should I reupload it? Message-ID: <Mutt.19970113100631.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970112223202.rhh@elmer.ct.picker.com>; from Randall Hopper on Jan 12, 1997 22:32:02 -0500 References: <Mutt.19970112112901.rhh@elmer.ct.picker.com> <Mutt.19970112185908.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> <Mutt.19970112223202.rhh@elmer.ct.picker.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Randall Hopper wrote: > I just re-checked the current workman port (workman-1.3.tgz in > packages-current) to verify nothing's changed: > > strings /usr/X11R6/bin/workman | grep ^/dev > /dev/rcd0c > > strings /opt/pkg/workman/bin/workman | grep ^/dev > /dev/rwcd0c > > and I have it setuid root for that reason. For which reason? And, what's wrong with ``workman -c /dev/rwcd0c''? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970113100631.j>