From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jan 13 01:49:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id BAA02592 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 01:49:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id BAA02579 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 01:49:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id KAA05481; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 10:41:35 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.4/8.6.9) id KAA01446; Mon, 13 Jan 1997 10:06:31 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 10:06:31 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: rhh@ct.picker.com (Randall Hopper) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: workman-atapi port - should I reupload it? References: X-Mailer: Mutt 0.55-PL10 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: ; from Randall Hopper on Jan 12, 1997 22:32:02 -0500 Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Randall Hopper wrote: > I just re-checked the current workman port (workman-1.3.tgz in > packages-current) to verify nothing's changed: > > strings /usr/X11R6/bin/workman | grep ^/dev > /dev/rcd0c > > strings /opt/pkg/workman/bin/workman | grep ^/dev > /dev/rwcd0c > > and I have it setuid root for that reason. For which reason? And, what's wrong with ``workman -c /dev/rwcd0c''? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)