From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 19:12:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9541065675 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-127.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-127.bluehost.com [67.222.38.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A945A8FC27 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 24680 invoked by uid 0); 11 Dec 2008 19:12:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by outboundproxy4.bluehost.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2008 19:12:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=g8Xhudo+docE4APqoPZdaO+voxXRkl+0ygpKu/3n5DKqjRDl3xml3cJZ4NUzhyPQ+qrdfm+dGDimmhk5StBE6MsHkZ/Sws/TLFQK9h4X3zDVIMY1svLdY1bZ5G0vFWEh; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LAqxi-0001mi-Es for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:12:38 -0700 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:12:19 -0700 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:12:19 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20081211191219.GB4970@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4be2da2e0812062344y26eddcc9sf589531d10c71a1c@mail.gmail.com> <20081207093713.O5433@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081207082932.04a7cf16@scorpio> <11167f520812070853i3b6fa6dei6e5c71669416470@mail.gmail.com> <20081207191727.V1610@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081207193517.GA20905@laverenz.de> <20081207121431.5dcb37f9@gom.home> <1228733482.4495.14.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20081211122714.W4172@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081211122714.W4172@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:12:38 -0000 --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:28:00PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > >The possibility here is the bells and whistles strangely enough DO work > >in tune and without sore lips... FreeBSD could be THAT good. >=20 > in bells and whistles windows is best. for those who require it paying a= =20 > bit for windows is not a problem. >=20 > Those who need to do actual work, we have FreeBSD for example Bullshit: http://sob.apotheon.org/?p=3D335 Please stop trolling. --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] print substr('Just another Perl hacker', 0, -2); --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklBZhMACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXVuQCgwFuonoN1gLrntMVHjhMUVE60 sfoAnRLIcvKgGB0bFRhPVUIXeiJ7Ec/Y =3PkK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz--