From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Jun 16 15:48:05 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA07184
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 15:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA07178
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 15:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.5/8.7.3) id PAA09898; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 15:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 15:47:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199706162247.PAA09898@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com
CC: fenner@parc.xerox.com, ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <97Jun15.102450pdt.177512@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> (message from Bill Fenner on Sun, 15 Jun 1997 10:24:43 PDT)
Subject: Re: Depending on ghostscript
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * >People complained about the ghostview package pulling in an unwanted
                                          ^^^^^^^

 * gs there but bring in the newest if there's nothing installed.  Is
 * this not the case?

No.  The "package" is the key word there; the port will work fine with
the dependency.

Satoshi