From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jul 25 07:53:58 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id HAA27449
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 25 Jul 1995 07:53:58 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA27435
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 1995 07:53:54 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id BAA03524; Tue, 25 Jul 1995 01:27:24 -0700
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 01:27:24 -0700
Message-Id: <199507250827.BAA03524@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: bde@zeta.org.au
CC: ache@astral.msk.su, current@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199507241657.CAA25622@godzilla.zeta.org.au> (message from Bruce Evans on Tue, 25 Jul 1995 02:57:57 +1000)
Subject: Re: does xdr_float addition requires minor number bumping or what?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * It requires bumping of the minor version number of libc.so but I think
 * we intend to only bump it (if necessary) before releases.

I suggest (now, as I did before) we bump it now, and note that fact in
the commit log of the appropriate Makefile.  That way we don't have to
worry about

(1) forgetting to bump it, and
(2) the mad rush of version number changes right before the release,
    which forced the recompilation of the entire ports tree last time

(What happened to the policy doc that I was supposed to write all this?)

Satoshi :)