Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 21:14:55 -0500 (CDT) From: "Doug Poland" <doug@polands.org> To: "Kent Stewart" <kstewart@owt.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make install port question across nfs Message-ID: <1754.172.16.1.33.1050372895.squirrel@email.polands.org> In-Reply-To: <200304141856.34264.kstewart@owt.com> References: <1593.172.16.1.33.1050370775.squirrel@email.polands.org> <200304141856.34264.kstewart@owt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kent Stewart said: > On Monday 14 April 2003 06:39 pm, Doug Poland > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to build a port on a fast machine >> and export the /usr/ports /usr/src /usr/obj via >> nfs to a number of slower machines. After >> running make on the fast machine, I want to do >> a make install on the slower boxes. >> > > What I have found is that they know the true > path. So, if you nfs_mount, it has to have the > same path as the system that built it. I mount > fs'es all of the time but I mount the fs as > /usr/src and /usr/ports on both machines. Then, > when you cd /usr/ports/x11 and do a pwd, you see > what you cded into. > > Kent > That's how I do it too. A pwd in a directory like /usr/ports/sysutils/apcupsd shows the same on all machines. Just for grins I tried a make clean ; make; make install on one of the slow boxes. When I did a make install on the other slow box then it "worked", i.e., it installed the port. So why is a make on one machine recognized and not another? Strange to a mere mortal like me. -- Regards, Doug
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1754.172.16.1.33.1050372895.squirrel>