From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 2 05:57:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4365106566B; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 05:57:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjoe@samodelkin.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D2A8FC12; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 05:57:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk5 with SMTP id k5so3960632ggn.13 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:57:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.45.6 with SMTP id i6mr2064052obm.3.1322805440806; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:57:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.76.225 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:57:20 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.92.220.178] In-Reply-To: <20111202015537.GB4111@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20111202015537.GB4111@dragon.NUXI.org> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 12:57:20 +0700 Message-ID: From: Max Khon To: obrien@freebsd.org, Max Khon , freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: removing libreadline from base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:57:21 -0000 David, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, David O'Brien wrote: If you go with (2) above, we'll still have *tons* of ports that want a > libreadline, so we'll just end up growing a port of it and we'll wind up > with a libreadline on the system anyway. Then you need to define what base system is. We have much more ports that depend on libintl or libglib2 than libreadline. Should we add these libs to the base system too? Also, almost all ports require gmake and autotools to be built. Should we add them to the base system too? Max