From owner-cvs-all Thu Jun 7 10:37:56 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from kalaid.f2f.com.ua (kalaid.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAC237B403; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 10:37:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net) Received: from Mail-In.Net (borey.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.24]) by kalaid.f2f.com.ua (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f57Hd8C69455; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:39:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net) Received: from vega.vega.com ([212.35.189.235]) by Mail-In.Net (8.11.3/8.H.Z) with ESMTP id f57HcK110270; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:38:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: (from max@localhost) by vega.vega.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f57HWYj16123; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:32:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) From: Maxim Sobolev Message-Id: <200106071732.f57HWYj16123@vega.vega.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/led Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/editors/led/files patch-Makefile.in To: will@physics.purdue.edu Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:31:55 +0300 (EEST) Cc: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG (Maxim Sobolev), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20010607121116.I85324@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> from "Will Andrews" at Jun 07, 2001 12:11:16 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:33:23PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.OR= > G) wrote: > > I do not see a reason for such a strict requirement here. People want fea= > tures today, > > not N days from now (for most packages release rolling is not a very quic= > k process). I > > think that our repo is able to bear the costs involved, especially consid= > ering that > > ports Attics are being emptied regularly, so there is no cumulative effec= > t. > > What are you smoking? They have only been emptied three times in > the last 3 years that I remember! With storage prices approaching zero with increasing speed this is enough. > If the package in question isn't going to be generated before the > next release (say one week) then it definitely should be a > concern when adding patches that would be in that release, since > bento doesn't upload the packages to ftp-master more than once a > week, as far as i know. I failed to understand what you are trying to say here. Sorry. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message