From owner-freebsd-scsi Sun Sep 1 09:36:54 1996 Return-Path: owner-freebsd-scsi Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA03209 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Sun, 1 Sep 1996 09:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (spinner.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA03198 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 1996 09:36:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.DIALix.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA07249; Mon, 2 Sep 1996 00:35:38 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: <199609011635.AAA07249@spinner.DIALix.COM> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96 To: "Justin T. Gibbs" cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch), freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Putting the "experimental" SCSI system on a branch In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 01 Sep 1996 09:20:40 MST." <199609011620.JAA02774@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 1996 00:35:38 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk "Justin T. Gibbs" wrote: > >Well, i thought this is what Justin intented? The changes should > >finally go into HEAD, it's just that this needs to be deferred until > >everything is in a working state again. > > What I want is to put it someplace where other developers can also > work on it. A vendor branch doesn't make the code accessible. and nobody could commit to it... The rcs deltas involved were rather unpleasant as well, as the delta stored in the file was relative to rev 1.1 of the file, not -current. Having the relative-to-current code on the vendor branch produces a large delta. It would be better to simply branch the files and commit the changes, if only it wasn't for the LITE2 branch hanging off the side via cvsup.. Cheers, -Peter