From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 23 03:08:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA14301 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 03:08:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from whale.gu.kiev.ua (whale.gu.net [194.93.190.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA14296 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 03:08:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from creator.gu.kiev.ua (stesin@creator.gu.kiev.ua [194.93.190.3]) by whale.gu.kiev.ua (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA97554; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 13:08:08 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 13:08:08 +0200 (EET) From: Andrew Stesin X-Sender: stesin@creator.gu.kiev.ua To: John Polstra cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fault-tolerant network with 2 ethernets In-Reply-To: <199701222351.PAA04715@austin.polstra.com> Message-ID: X-NCC-RegID: ua.gu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > At first I was hoping that routed could do this for me, without No. RIP sucks and must die :) [...] > Is this analysis correct? Kinda of... who cares. > Is there a simple way to get what I want? Yes. See below. > How about a non-simple way? It is the same as a non-simple one :) Use Gated and OSPF. It will even do some kind of load-sharing then, you will get kinda of 20Mb between the hosts included into the structure. Please don't hesitate to ask me for help in setting this up. -- Best, Andrew Stesin nic-hdl: ST73-RIPE