From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 3 11:10:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA001065672 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryd.freebsd@free.fr) Received: from smtp8-g19.free.fr (smtp8-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89768FC21 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryd.freebsd@free.fr) Received: from smtp8-g19.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp8-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1C717F522; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:10:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from imp7-g19.free.fr (imp7-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.38]) by smtp8-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA8117F57B; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:10:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp7-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 705B23FDD; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:10:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from 145.242.11.1 ([145.242.11.1]) by imp.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:10:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1204542617.47cbdc993499b@imp.free.fr> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:10:17 +0100 From: gregoryd.freebsd@free.fr To: "Chris H." References: <1204151575.84335.3.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <1204310983.47c853c70577d@imp.free.fr> <47C89B18.8010803@infracaninophile.co.uk> <1BBD0D48B63AE41DF673F6C4@[10.110.3.211]> <1204381259.93575.15.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <20080302010048.5n293u9tic8cwww8@webmail.1command.com> <1204527716.47cba264d0240@imp.free.fr> <20080303022049.4f7srhzt7o88g4cc@webmail.1command.com> In-Reply-To: <20080303022049.4f7srhzt7o88g4cc@webmail.1command.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.8 X-Originating-IP: 145.242.11.1 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:10:23 -0000 Quoting "Chris H." : Hi ! > In this context, I believe that it makes more sense to place the > server related install on the first disc. This makes it possible > to install a server with the least amount of effort. Granted. > It /also/ > makes it quite possible for a would-be desktop user to likely > only need to exchange discs /one/ time. As the most frequently > used desktop items will fit onto their own disc (one disc). I fully agree with that. > > Bottom line: this arrangement should ultimately make everyones > life easier, and maybe even happier. :) Sure enough. :-) cheers, gregory delfly