Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:58:20 +0200 From: "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pc with 4G memory Message-ID: <9bbcef730809180058u6d119a3exf11baf10bdced709@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <48D1F7AB.5010103@FreeBSD.org> References: <137523.41269.qm@web52108.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <gairlk$flu$1@ger.gmane.org> <48D1F7AB.5010103@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2008/9/18 Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org>:
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>>
>> * Use a PAE kernel, which works fairly well, but doesn't support kernel
>> modules (if you are not familiar with kernel modules then you probably
>> don't need them so ignore this). There's a pre-packaged kernel
>> configuration named "PAE" for this.
>
> PAE has supported kernel modules for quite a long time.
KLDs are supported under PAE? Are the following lines in pae(4):
"""
Since KLD modules are not compiled with the same options headers that the
kernel is compiled with, they must not be loaded into a kernel compiled
with the PAE option.
"""
and these in the PAE configuration fille:
"""
# Don't build modules with this kernel config, since they are not built with
# the correct options headers.
makeoptions NO_MODULES=yes
"""
wrong?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9bbcef730809180058u6d119a3exf11baf10bdced709>