From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 12 11:33:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE09502 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 11:33:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 289822B10 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 11:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (unknown [130.255.26.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E73343552 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:32:59 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5231A654.5090804@marino.st> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:32:36 +0200 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Berkeley DB 4.1 References: <20130912110937.GA34979@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20130912110937.GA34979@over-yonder.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 11:33:14 -0000 On 9/12/2013 13:09, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:57:06PM +0200 I heard the voice of > Ivan Voras, and lo! it spake thus: >> >> And while the argument seems valid, it also doesn't have an estimate >> of which / how many ports will break with a more recent bdb. > > FWIW, I've manually pushed all the systems I've managed to higher > versions than 4.2 for years. I remember having 4.6 around a lot. In > a quick look around now, I see 4.8 on everything but one system that's > running 4.7, servers and a couple workstations. I can't recall _ever_ > seeing a breakage. If it helps the discussion, dports set the db version default to 4.8 since the beginning of dports. We found a couple of ports that misadvertised their compatibility but for the most part, it's been smooth for us (DragonFly). John