From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 26 18:16: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hex.databits.net (hex.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB71D37B405 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 18:16:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 69398 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Dec 2001 02:16:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 21:16:01 -0500 From: Pete Fritchman To: Edwin Groothuis Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port-lint run Message-ID: <20011226211601.B69259@databits.net> References: <20011227115329.A38024@k7.mavetju.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011227115329.A38024@k7.mavetju.org>; from edwin@mavetju.org on Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:53:29AM +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ++ 27/12/01 11:53 +1100 - Edwin Groothuis: | Greetings, | | After running portlint on the ports maintained by me, I wonder how | people (and commiters) would response on a flood of PR's which | would maximize the thumbs-up output of portlint for all ports. | | Mostly the patches will change rm in ${RM}, remove trailing spaces | and so on. Commiting them will be a boring task, and the absence | of the will of commiting them will not be good for the mood of the | persons who put some time in it. | | So before I start my flood of PR's I ask you, should I do it or not? I'd say keep them in your local tree, and next time you submit an update for the port include those changes. -pete -- Pete Fritchman [petef@(databits.net|freebsd.org|csh.rit.edu)] finger petef@databits.net for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message