From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 11:20:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4709C37B401 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6ECC43F3F for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:20:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h68IKJUp044687 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:20:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h68IKJ4N044686; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:20:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:20:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200307081820.h68IKJ4N044686@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: David Thiel Subject: Re: ports/53558: new port of Gerrit Pape's runit package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Thiel List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 18:20:20 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/53558; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Thiel To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/53558: new port of Gerrit Pape's runit package Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:18:03 -0659 I disagree. 54228 doesn't include a FreeBSD rc script, and a version number bump should be all my port needs to make it current. Should I be submitting PRs for ports that haven't been accepted yet, when a new version comes out? Thanks, David On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:57:52PM +0400, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > Obsoleted by ports/54228.