From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov  9 16:31:45 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36DF816A41F;
	Wed,  9 Nov 2005 16:31:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92BF43D45;
	Wed,  9 Nov 2005 16:31:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from qlovarnika.bg.datamax (qlovarnika.bg.datamax [192.168.10.2])
	by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id 77DA5B830;
	Wed,  9 Nov 2005 18:31:43 +0200 (EET)
Received: (nullmailer pid 75745 invoked by uid 1002);
	Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:31:43 -0000
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:31:43 +0200
From: Vasil Dimov <vd@datamax.bg>
To: Wesley Shields <wxs@csh.rit.edu>
Message-ID: <20051109163143.GA75721@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
References: <20051107154634.GA40923@heechee.tobez.org>
	<43704ACA.1070708@FreeBSD.org> <437062D6.6050001@FreeBSD.org>
	<20051109045413.GA64842@holestein.holy.cow>
	<20051109142817.GG22596@heechee.tobez.org>
	<20051109165345.GA68690@csh.rit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20051109165345.GA68690@csh.rit.edu>
X-OS: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>,
	Lars Thegler <lth@FreeBSD.org>, Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Request for comments: port-tags
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: vd@datamax.bg
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:31:45 -0000


--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:53:45AM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote:
> I would think that if someone goes through the work to define a TAGS
> field that it would be more accurate than what your getting from COMMENT
> and will be getting from pkg-descr.  In order to weed out any
> less-than-descriptive tags I would use only the TAGS field if it exists
> in the makefile and if it does not then use the combination of keywords
> from COMMENT and pkg-descr.

I agree.

--=20
Vasil Dimov

--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFDciRuFw6SP/bBpCARAq+vAKDMfldNBqLybyw9tKfdgPhuy9tOUACghQ/H
JTYzAwEESrLaLt6d992l868=
=mqZH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--