From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 00:29:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D98EA66 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 00:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (vm135.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.16.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 848D112DB for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 00:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spock.drpetervoigt.private (p5DC4C58C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.196.197.140]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t4C0T5fQ000617 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 May 2015 02:29:06 +0200 Received: from kirk.drpetervoigt.private (kirk.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by spock.drpetervoigt.private (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 943A34A033A1; Tue, 12 May 2015 02:29:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 02:28:57 +0200 From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: Yuri , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl? Message-ID: <20150512022857.7230c163@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> In-Reply-To: <55512E8F.8040508@rawbw.com> References: <20150509125643.0bda93e6@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <554EEBB5.8010304@rawbw.com> <20150511202110.34e6e29c@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55510C22.9050900@rawbw.com> <20150512000259.32a44ec4@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55512E8F.8040508@rawbw.com> Organization: =?UTF-8?B?VW5pdmVyc2l0w6R0IE9zbmFicsO8Y2s=?= X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.5.12.1518 (Univ. Osnabrueck) X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report= HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1300_1399 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, FROM_NAME_PHRASE 0, RDNS_POOLED 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_SPECIFIC 0, REFERENCES 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __RDNS_POOLED_10 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS X-PMX-Spam-Level: IIIIIIII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 00:29:19 -0000 On Mon, 11 May 2015 15:34:55 -0700 Yuri wrote: > On 05/11/2015 15:02, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > > OK, I currently haven't firefox installed and did not download the > > package to do this test myself. But your results go along with the > > output of "make run-depends-list". And back to my initial question: > > Why does "pkg install firefox" in spite of this insist on > > installing port openssl? > > # pkg install porttree && porttree www/firefox > shows all places the port depends on others in tree-like fashion. > Thanks for your hint to porttree, however, on my system: # pkg install porttree Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. The following 3 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: porttree: 0.3.r52 py27-networkx: 1.8.1 openssl: 1.0.2_1 The process will require 18 MiB more space. 4 MiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: N What is wrong with my system? Why does porttree need port openssl as well. It is obviosuly wrong. If I build ports-mgmt/porttree from source, there is not dependency from port openssl. Might there be something wrong with my package database? How can I fix? I will answer tomorrow to other aspects of your latest posts. Peter