From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 09:04:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 2019516A4CF; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 09:04:04 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 09:04:04 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Jeff Roberson Message-ID: <20041101090404.GB52876@FreeBSD.org> References: <200410300735.i9U7ZrL2031884@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200410300735.i9U7ZrL2031884@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 09:04:04 -0000 On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 07:35:53AM +0000, Jeff Roberson wrote: > jeff 2004-10-30 07:35:53 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/kern sched_ule.c > Log: > - In sched_prio() check to see if the kse is assigned to a runq as the > check for TD_ON_RUNQ() no longer means the thread is really on a run- > queue. I suspect this state should be re-evaluated as it must mean > something else now. This fixes ULE+KSE+PREEMPTION on UP x86. Leaving aside technical concerns Julian'd mentioned, it's really cool to have you doing ULE work again. Keep it up! ;-) ./danfe