From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 8 19:11:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A91C1065670; Sat, 8 Aug 2009 19:11:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lstewart@freebsd.org) Received: from lauren.room52.net (lauren.room52.net [210.50.193.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2008FC16; Sat, 8 Aug 2009 19:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lstewart-laptop.caia.swin.edu.au (host86-144-70-159.range86-144.btcentralplus.com [86.144.70.159]) (authenticated bits=0) by lauren.room52.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n78JBcWC081086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 9 Aug 2009 05:11:41 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from lstewart@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4A7DCDDB.3010205@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:11:23 +0100 From: Lawrence Stewart User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090808) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4A5C954C.5060507@quip.cz> <4A5C9A98.5020006@isafeelin.org> <4A5CA8CF.2070906@freebsd.org> <4A5D9FD8.3080209@isafeelin.org> <4A5E02DE.1010908@freebsd.org> <4A7DC792.2080200@freebsd.org> <4A7DC956.5010402@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4A7DC956.5010402@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on lauren.room52.net Cc: Frederique Rijsdijk , Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster -x not working? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2009 19:11:54 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > Lawrence Stewart wrote: > >> Today, I again had need of the ability to exclude multiple ports from an >> update run. It turns out your tip doesn't work with portmaster, though I >> suspect it would with portupgrade. > > For now, if you need to exclude more than one port you can check the > man page about +IGNOREME files. > Ok cool. I would definitely like to be able to specify things dynamically on a per-run basis as well though without adding +IGNOREME files. I often want to special case the exclusion of ports one time only. >> Doug, what do you think of the attached patch? > > I think it's interesting, but not quite how I would do it. I have > plans to rewrite the command line parser in order to accommodate this, > and make things easier to work with generally, so stay tuned. No problemo, will stay tuned. Cheers, Lawrence