Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 13:45:56 -0500 (EST) From: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/acpi/acpiconf acpiconf.c Message-ID: <20040305134539.A52877@xeon.unixathome.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpbrnbkucq.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200403050239.i252dI0u007320@sana.init-main.com> <20040304.201932.78712700.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040305101907.P30482@root.org> <xzpbrnbkucq.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes: > > * Unified sysctls for battery and thermal (hw.power.XXX) > > * Make sure both acpi(4) and apm(4) export information through that > > interface. > > * Move apm(8) to use those sysctls. > > * Remove any non-acpi-specific code from acpiconf(8) > > Mmm, remind me again why we still bother supporting apm? I don't know. My guess: there are people using it. --=20 Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040305134539.A52877>