Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:57:44 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        fs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 230260] [FUSE] [PERFORMANCE]: Performance issue (I/O block size)
Message-ID:  <bug-230260-3630-mikdqtVnZW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-230260-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-230260-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230260

--- Comment #14 from Kenneth D. Merry <ken@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #12)

Your changed fixed the problem, thanks!

You are correct that MAXPHYS is larger than the default:

options         DFLTPHYS=3D(512*1024)
options         MAXPHYS=3D(1024*1056)

Could you merge this to stable/12?  This will likely break LTFS for most pe=
ople
using it.

Since tape drives don't do tagged queueing, the common way to get better
performance is to use a larger block size.  LTFS supports up to 1MB block
sizes, and in order to read tapes from other systems and get better
performance, we set MAXPHYS to over 1MB.  (So we can get 1MB I/O regardless=
 of
alignment.)  DFLTPHYS goes along with that.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-230260-3630-mikdqtVnZW>