Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:48:42 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Philippe Aud?oud <jadawin@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/darktable Makefile Message-ID: <20111104094842.GB96244@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111104093039.GA89435@tuxaco.net> References: <201111040923.pA49NfeX002682@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111104093039.GA89435@tuxaco.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 10:30:39AM +0100, Philippe Aud?oud wrote: > On Fri, 04 Nov 2011, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > danfe 2011-11-04 09:23:41 UTC > > > > Modified files: > > graphics/darktable Makefile > > Log: > > Allow to build without rawspeed backend (use libraw instead). > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.20 +8 -0 ports/graphics/darktable/Makefile > > Why two commit for two changes in one port? One port, but two totally unrelated commits to two unrelated (separate) files. Imagine doing "cvs log" on pkg-descr: why pollute the results with something which obviously had nothing to do with it? Ditto for Makefile. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111104094842.GB96244>