From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Mar 1 07:29:50 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id HAA03511 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 07:29:50 -0800 Received: from cats.ucsc.edu (root@cats-po-1.UCSC.EDU [128.114.129.22]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA03495 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 07:29:47 -0800 Received: from scruz.ucsc.edu by cats.ucsc.edu with SMTP id HAA07592; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 07:29:41 -0800 Received: from osprey by scruz.ucsc.edu id aa14448; 1 Mar 95 8:27 PST Received: (from markd@localhost) by Grizzly.COM (8.6.9/8.6.9) id GAA01355; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 06:50:54 -0800 Date: Wed, 1 Mar 1995 06:50:54 -0800 From: Mark Diekhans Message-Id: <199503011450.GAA01355@Grizzly.COM> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de CC: freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com In-reply-to: <199503010812.JAA11126@uriah.heep.sax.de> (message from J Wunsch on Wed, 1 Mar 1995 09:12:40 +0100 (MET)) Subject: Re: [MAILER-DAEMON@freefall.cdrom.com: Returned mail: unknown mailer error 2] Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> >Synopsis: "mt status" does not work with SCSI tape drives. > >> mt -f /dev/nrst0 status > >Half an hour ago, i just thought: `What would people think, is it >better to revive the old 1.1.5 ``st'' program, or merge over Julian's >changes into our ``mt'' program?' > >I'd vote for the latter. Agreed. This is where people from other unix systems expect to find the functionallity. Mark