Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Sep 1999 19:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu>
Cc:        Bert Manchee <berticus@erols.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   RE: Socks5 download
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909091937080.76113-100000@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <0FHS00KRENS54K@gkar.cc.vt.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, John Baldwin wrote:

> On 09-Sep-99 Bert Manchee wrote:
> > If the current branch of the ports collection is requiring
> > socks5-v1.0r9.tar.gz, why is it not available anywhere.  it doesn't
> > exist on your website, although there's a link to it.  and on the NEC
> > site supporting the socks5 server, they only offer socks5-v1.0r10.tar.
> > gz - revision 10 instead of 9.  what am i to do about this???
> > please help.

The license terms for the NEC socks package prevent us from hosting the
distfile elsewhere, so you have to fetch it manually (& register for it in
the process). This means that when they upgrade to a new version it breaks
the port, since the MD5 checksum changes, at a very least.

You should contact the maintainer of the port (the MAINTAINER= line in
/usr/ports/net/socks5) and see whether he is preparing an updated port.

In the meantime, you can try fetching the distfile by hand as explained
when you do a 'make' in /usr/ports/net/socks5 (which you will have to do
anyway), and edit the Makefile to refer to the new filename. Then do a
"make NOCHECKSUM=true install clean". If the new version doesn't compile
out-of-the box, or any patches for the previous version fail to apply,
you'll have to build it by hand.

Kris



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909091937080.76113-100000>