Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 03:04:04 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Tilman Linneweh <arved@FreeBSD.org> Cc: amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: fetch calculates size wrong Message-ID: <xzpu0v9b20r.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040811074556.GD24054@arved.at> (Tilman Linneweh's message of "Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:45:56 %2B0200") References: <20040807190400.GB24054@arved.at> <xzpisbu4ufi.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040811074556.GD24054@arved.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tilman Linneweh <arved@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Hm, the code in libfetch hasn't been touched for a while, and I didn't no= tice > any problem with fetch in June.=20 I just heard from kuriyama@ who had the same problem and managed to track it down. There's code in fetch.c that incorrectly expects struct stat to be unmodified when stat(2) fails, and gcc 3.4 just happens to break that assumption on amd64. I'll commit a patch shortly. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpu0v9b20r.fsf>