Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 23:11:42 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> To: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER Branch [was: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc] Message-ID: <20050507201142.GA9298@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <200505072153.54369.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> References: <20050502201921.4F0387306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <F89B71C9-2863-498F-BE9F-D41DFB8A070F@bis.midco.net> <20050507192448.GA1401@gothmog.gr> <200505072153.54369.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2005-05-07 21:53, Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> wrote: >> As far as a branch is concerned, please *NO*! Anyone who wishes to >> maintain a separate IP Filter spinoff of CURRENT can do it using >> his own disk space and CVS repository (or Perforce branch, if you >> prefer). > > But I think that this kind of pull-ups really needs of some HEAD-UPs > and the assistance of people more closer to current, before the > breakage. That is not strictly necessary, as long as a full "make universe" is run before any widespread changes that may break one or more arches. > At last, I can't see this kind of matters in NetBSD, where the > pullups are done by 'NetBSD people'. Darren is one of the "FreeBSD people".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050507201142.GA9298>