From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 19:01:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB07B106564A for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0958FC08 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2012 13:32:51 -0500 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BIQ51093; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:32:50 -0500 X-Auth-ID: anat Received: from 209-6-63-29.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO utka.zajac) ([209.6.63.29]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2012 13:32:50 -0500 Message-ID: <4F3E9D52.1090000@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:32:50 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111013 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4F3E289D.9050605@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E2CED.90601@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E3537.9040105@FreeBSD.org> <1329478316415-5492205.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F3E5D41.9050503@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jakub Lach , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recent portrevision bump for libvpx X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:01:39 -0000 On 17.02.2012 12:36, Chris Rees wrote: >> Yet again I'd like to point out, that -- contrary to the wide-spread >> > practice -- ports should not, by default, list a particular shlib major >> > number in LIB_DEPENDS. Only in cases, when a wrong version of some libfoo is >> > known to cause problems, should the correct version be explicitly given in >> > LIB_DEPENDS. > Perhaps someone could make a patch for the Porter's Handbook. Last time I broached the subject, I could not get my argument through... I even once made a patch, which would've allowed the user (at their own risk) to tell bsd.port.mk to ignore all explicitly-specified shlib-major numbers -- and portmgr@ shut it down, even though the new flag would not be on by default. If the consensus has changed over the years, coming up with the new text for the manual would not be a problem... -mi