From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 09:12:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B5416A417 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 09:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from melamine.cuivre.fr.eu.org (melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org [82.225.155.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3FB13C4B3 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 09:12:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: by melamine.cuivre.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BBF115C5E9; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 11:11:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 11:11:45 +0200 From: Thomas Quinot To: Patrick Hajek Message-ID: <20070902091145.GB71871@melamine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <20070829170749.GA20549@lbl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070829170749.GA20549@lbl.gov> X-message-flag: WARNING! Using Outlook can damage your computer. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent changes in atapi-cam? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 09:12:07 -0000 * Patrick Hajek, 2007-08-29 : > >> The upgrade was successful with one exception: > >> ad0: 95205MB at ata0-master UDMA100 > >> acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 > >> acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 > >> acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 > >> acd0: FAILURE - READ_TOC ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 > >> acd0: FAILURE - READ_TOC ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 > > >atapicam is disabled in your kernel configuration, so I assume you are > >loading it as a module. Do you still get the errors above (on acd0) if > >you do *not* load the atapi-cam module? > > >Thomas. > > Correct. When I first encountered the error, the vaious components were > compiled into the kernel. Taking a wild stab, I decided to see if > loading it as a module would result the the same issue and yes, it did. so can you confirm whether you still get the acd0 errors when you do NOT load atapi-cam at all (nor have it precompiled in the kernel)? Thomas.