From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 8 13:32:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430E016A403; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derrick@uniquestrength.net) Received: from alnrmhc12.comcast.net (alnrmhc12.comcast.net [206.18.177.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733CE43D82; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:32:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derrick@uniquestrength.net) Received: from mail.uniquestrength.net ([68.55.97.199]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20061108133218b12007kgtde>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:32:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.uniquestrength.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.uniquestrength.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1828D5C67; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 07:46:19 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uniquestrength.net Received: from mail.uniquestrength.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.uniquestrength.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QgyypDkPus7q; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 07:46:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (unknown [10.10.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.uniquestrength.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECB25C42; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 07:46:15 -0500 (EST) From: Derrick Edwards To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:41:13 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200611072108.40934.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <20061108124122.GA50384@rb1.palstra.com> In-Reply-To: <20061108124122.GA50384@rb1.palstra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611080841.15139.derrick@uniquestrength.net> Cc: Jonathan Horne Subject: Re: php 5.2.0... go boom! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 13:32:24 -0000 On Wednesday 08 November 2006 07:41, Riemer Palstra wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 01:07:31PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > I have yet to see a problem. So far, so good. > > I haven't had any problems with PHP 5.2.0 and its own modules, I only > can't get pecl-PDO (1.0.3) to build against it. It even seems to be a > bit faster than 5.1.6, but I haven't fully benchmarked it yet. Same here.. PHP5.2.0 works great here!