Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 17:42:41 -0500 From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: kstewart@urx.com Cc: Leland <lsp3@gte.net>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com>, wyrdwulf@catskill.net, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: digital camera Message-ID: <15109.42337.204712.986001@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <3B058149.D60A5D27@urx.com> References: <200105180150.f4I1ovS17332@mail-1.catskill.net> <003601c0df57$813bc2a0$44a4a518@we.mediaone.net> <20010517222006W.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <003401c0dfcb$98221720$44a4a518@we.mediaone.net> <3B058149.D60A5D27@urx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com> types: > > But much better than you would get with a digital camera. > > Not with the 3mp cameras. Most of the photo CD's that I got were less than > 1024x768. I have a friend with one of the newer 3 megapixel cameras and that That's wierd. I only got one before getting a digital camera, but it had the 16base (2048x3072) images on it. <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15109.42337.204712.986001>