From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Dec  1  3:10:47 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E45F15AA8
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  1 Dec 1999 03:10:40 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.040 #1)
	id 11t7ea-000EGl-00; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 13:10:32 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Ariel Burbaickij <Ariel.Burbaickij@mni.fh-giessen.de>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: development models of some ports(expecially Gnome) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 30 Nov 1999 17:48:29 +0100."
             <Pine.GSO.4.10.9911301736110.17638-100000@sun10> 
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 13:10:31 +0200
Message-ID: <54854.944046631@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Tue, 30 Nov 1999 17:48:29 +0100, Ariel Burbaickij wrote:

> Now I would like to know what is so idiotic in idea of doing
> the same:just maintain two branches of gnome ports :stable and
> development.

Please take this up with the gnomecore port maintainer:

	nakai@FreeBSD.org

Again, I urge you to read the Ports Collection web page:

	http://www.freebsd.org/ports/

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message