From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Tue Jul 14 11:20:29 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D28099C1DF
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:20:29 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org)
Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org
 (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B3F38E
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:20:28 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org)
Received: by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346)
 id D91C91EE2; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:20:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:20:28 +0000
To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
From: "meloun-miracle-cz (Michal Meloun)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org>
Reply-to: D3034+327+45b7a5c19a24c07f@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D3034: Add BUS_UNMASK_INTR method
Message-ID: <f2940e42dd29a54d5e62a4362417feed@localhost.localdomain>
X-Priority: 3
Thread-Topic: D3034: Add BUS_UNMASK_INTR method
X-Herald-Rules: <28>, <31>, <32>, <34>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-u7g3pamdppe4sw6i6zt6>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-axkijn4pfdxlezgbnt7g>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-q5lmute3rwskeizvu5gf>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-yhwnadxnjthofqelhkdx>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-pns6zgllnr6ze4h7ms3o>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-6m5mo2kjikkzyd33ld4n>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-wjsgsqx4il4yblud7x6c>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-ueipubl3jymguf56hiqy>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-q5lmute3rwskeizvu5gf>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-pns6zgllnr6ze4h7ms3o>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-axkijn4pfdxlezgbnt7g>
In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-knxjlihey7dhpvtvtsyg-req@FreeBSD.org>
References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-knxjlihey7dhpvtvtsyg-req@FreeBSD.org>
Thread-Index: Njk5OTUyY2Q2NjQxNGE1MDJhNmZkNGQ3MjI0IFWk8Hw=
Precedence: bulk
X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes
X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: <differential-comment>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:20:29 -0000

meloun-miracle-cz added a comment.

With full respect, I don’t think that this new bus method is right solution for our problem(s).
The proposed bus_unmask_intr()  cannot be used from outside of secondary CPUs startup context.  It cannot be used for SPI, it cannot be used of PPI after scheduler is started on given core.
Why you cannot simply call arm_unmask_irq() directly from driver?


REPOSITORY
  rS FreeBSD src repository

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3034

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: wma_semihalf.com, emaste, imp, ian, andrew, zbb
Cc: freebsd-arm-list, meloun-miracle-cz, imp, andrew, emaste