Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:20:28 +0000
From:      "meloun-miracle-cz (Michal Meloun)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   [Differential] [Commented On] D3034: Add BUS_UNMASK_INTR method
Message-ID:  <f2940e42dd29a54d5e62a4362417feed@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-knxjlihey7dhpvtvtsyg-req@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-knxjlihey7dhpvtvtsyg-req@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
meloun-miracle-cz added a comment.

With full respect, I don’t think that this new bus method is right solution for our problem(s).
The proposed bus_unmask_intr()  cannot be used from outside of secondary CPUs startup context.  It cannot be used for SPI, it cannot be used of PPI after scheduler is started on given core.
Why you cannot simply call arm_unmask_irq() directly from driver?


REPOSITORY
  rS FreeBSD src repository

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3034

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: wma_semihalf.com, emaste, imp, ian, andrew, zbb
Cc: freebsd-arm-list, meloun-miracle-cz, imp, andrew, emaste



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f2940e42dd29a54d5e62a4362417feed>