From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 20 22:55:35 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580FC16A417; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:55:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [194.62.233.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F4F13C4A3; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IYUvi-0007PT-GO; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:55:30 +0400 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IYUx7-0001P9-N2; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:56:57 +0400 To: Marcus Reid References: <20070920184201.GA72805@kobe.laptop> <20070920184606.GA73060@kobe.laptop> <20070920223015.GA88368@blazingdot.com> <20070920224336.GA94445@blazingdot.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:56:57 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20070920224336.GA94445@blazingdot.com> (Marcus Reid's message of "Thu\, 20 Sep 2007 15\:43\:36 -0700") Message-ID: <30854022@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Giorgos Keramidas , Colin Percival Subject: Re: portsnap snapshot corruption? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:55:35 -0000 On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:43:36 -0700 Marcus Reid wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 03:30:15PM -0700, Marcus Reid wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 09:46:06PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > On 2007-09-20 21:42, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > > > > > > Is something wrong with the portsnap servers, or should I try to see if > > > > there's something odd with my latest CURRENT upgrade? > > > > > > Damn, right after having spent an hour on this *and* posting a message, > > > our local admin notified us that our network has started using a > > > transparent proxy -- which is apparently broken. > > > > > > Sorry for the noise. I'll try to resolve this with our IT guys :) > > > > I've been having the same problem and I'm not behind any sort of proxy. > > Also, what sort of proxy would corrupt that 49MB gzipped tar file in a > > way that it passes gunzip -t? I think this is a real problem with > > the snapshots being served up by the portsnap servers. I posted this > > issue to freebsd-ports@ yesterday. > I should provide a couple more details of what I've seen: > - The portsnap fetch downloads the 49MB .tgz, and it extracts > properly. This file is not corrupted (passes gzip checksum). > - In the portsnap/snap directory, many of the .gz > files are correct, but many (looks like 1/4?) of them are > truncated somehow. They are gzip files, but they are corrupted. Isn't it related to a recent libarchive backout?: . src/lib/libarchive/archive_write_disk.c rev.1.16 . src/lib/libarchive/test/test_write_disk.c rev.1.5 WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve