From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 17 12:18:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA09504 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 12:18:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from mail.netcetera.dk (root@sleipner.netcetera.dk [194.192.207.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA09494 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 12:18:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leifn@image.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.netcetera.dk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with UUCP id TAA12583 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 19:27:31 +0100 Received: by swimsuit.swimsuit.roskildebc.dk (0.99.970109) id AA02672; 17 Dec 97 19:20:56 +0100 From: leifn@image.dk (Leif Neland) Date: 17 Dec 97 10:44:16 +0100 Subject: Re: natd Message-ID: <7fb_9712171920@swimsuit.swimsuit.roskildebc.dk> References: Organization: Fidonet: UNIX-sysadm søger job To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 16 Dec 97 23:36:01 benh@blues.jpj.net wrote regarding Re: natd b> Well, for starters, 10.x.x.x addresses shouldn't be coming in off b> the Internet. :) But some ISP is using such an adress for its www-proxy. Leif Neland leifn@image.dk --- |Fidonet: Leif Neland 2:234/49 |Internet: leifn@image.dk