From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 17 15:38:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4846116A401; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@more.net) Received: from jane.spg.more.net (jane.spg.more.net [207.160.133.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A0C13C455; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@more.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jane.spg.more.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932B09C0B1; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:07:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Dan D Niles To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070404092810.A67103@ns1.feral.com> References: <200704041510.l34FA6Df098847@freefall.freebsd.org> <20070404092810.A67103@ns1.feral.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:07:05 -0500 Message-Id: <1176822425.18915.13.camel@jane.spg.more.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harrison Grundy , mjacob@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/111146: fsck fails on 6T filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:38:13 -0000 On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 09:28 -0700, mjacob@freebsd.org wrote: > If you're going to newfs the array at this point, can you do a binary > search starting from 1.8TB to find the size for you that fsck fails to > work? I ran newfs on a new (clean) 6TB array populated with the same data. It worked just fine, and the most memory it used was 543 MB. Dan