From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 25 00:24:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E74216A4B3; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-56339.0x50c6aa0a.abnxx2.customer.tele.dk [80.198.170.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974D644013; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:24:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8P7O1Kg050706; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:24:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8P7O086050705; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:24:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Soren Schmidt Message-Id: <200309250724.h8P7O086050705@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <20030924225703.6AF682A8E7@canning.wemm.org> To: Peter Wemm Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:24:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.3 cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Pav Lucistnik Subject: Re: ata-lowlevel.c ate my slave disc X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 07:24:07 -0000 It seems Peter Wemm wrote: > > > Hi, I want to report a regression in ATAng. It's exactly same problem > > that Richard Nyberg reported on current@ 9 days ago. > > > > After updating to today -current, my system no longer see primary slave > > hard drive. It's one year old Seagate 80 GB hard drive. > > FWIW, I have the same problem on my amd64 boxes at home. It will not see > the drive if its in slave mode. It too happens to be a seagate. > > > If I revert a 1.10 revision of ata-lowlevel.c (#ifdef 0 a section of > > probing code), the disc is back and works absolutely fine. > > I'll try the same later on. I need the dmesg output from a verbose boot to get any further with this (of cause from an unpatched uptodate -current) -Søren