Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 09:28:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ron G. Minnich" <rminnich@Sarnoff.COM> To: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@geli.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>, Brian Tao <taob@io.org>, FREEBSD-HACKERS-L <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Larry McVoy <lm@slovax.engr.sgi.com> Subject: Re: New lmbench available (fwd) Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951027092536.13429D-100000@terra> In-Reply-To: <199510270348.UAA04313@geli.clusternet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
actually the big surprise for me was walking the results and seeing freebsd outrunning linux in so many areas on the 100 mhz boxes. I knew that it was marginally faster in places but the margin this time (except for ctx) was surprising. Also the aix ctx results are interesting: kind of shows the advantage of single-address-space operating systems, as opposed to the unix model. It's useful to show freebsd performance at the limit. But it's also useful to show it on a plain vanilla 133 mhz box without $$$ boltons. BTW ttcp on freebsd on 100BT interfaces (SMC) is at about 56 Mhz. These are neptune, i understand triton would be better. ron Ron Minnich |Like a knife through Daddy's heart: rminnich@earth.sarnoff.com |"Don't make fun of Windows, daddy! It takes care (609)-734-3120 | of all my files and it's reliable and I like it".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.951027092536.13429D-100000>