From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 7 12:46:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from h132-197-97-45.gte.com (h132-197-97-45.gte.com [132.197.97.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEE837C068 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ak03@gte.com) Received: (from ak03@localhost) by h132-197-97-45.gte.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA73179; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 15:45:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ak03) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200004071942.MAA01133@papermill.wrs.com> Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 15:45:30 -0400 (EDT) Organization: GTE Laboratories Inc. From: "Alexander N. Kabaev" To: David Holloway Subject: Re: Overwhelming messages from /sys/netinet/if_ether.c Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, (Donn Miller) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have the same impression fom reading dhclient sources. On 07-Apr-00 David Holloway wrote: > I say with 99% certainty that assigning 0.0.0.0 to > the interface is a requirement of dhcp. > > You can't stop using it and expect dhcp to work. > ---------------------------------- E-Mail: Alexander N. Kabaev Date: 07-Apr-00 Time: 15:44:39 ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message