From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 20 21:46:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C274C21E; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78C5E2F6E; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1X8yw9-000NXE-8d; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 23:46:29 +0200 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 23:46:29 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Daniel Feenberg Subject: Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ? Message-ID: <20140720214629.GF197@home.opsec.eu> References: <53C706C9.6090506@com.jkkn.dk> <20140718110645.GN87212@FreeBSD.org> <20140718151255.b3e677d9.gerrit.kuehn@aei.mpg.de> <53CA2D39.6000204@sasktel.net> <20140720123916.GV96250@e-new.0x20.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:46:29 -0000 Hi! > > And you don't seem to get the point that _someone_ has to do the work. > > No one has stepped up so far, so nothing is going to change. Franco Fichtner said he's interested in doing it. He probably needs funding. > No one with authority has yet said that "If an updated pf were available, > would be welcomed". Which person or group would you view as "authority" in this case ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !