From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 3 17:30:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB894DD; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BDC1C23; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379CB58407C; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lab (ip72-219-240-45.dc.dc.cox.net [72.219.240.45]) (Authenticated sender: trhodes@fbsdsecure.org) by homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BCBCC584058; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:30:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 13:30:12 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: svn commit: r319792 - head/sysutils/fsc Message-Id: <20130603133012.114c2ae7.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <51ACC994.4060608@FreeBSD.org> References: <201306031632.r53GWPdP069628@svn.freebsd.org> <51ACC994.4060608@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 17:30:52 -0000 On Mon, 03 Jun 2013 11:51:32 -0500 Bryan Drewery wrote: > This is bad form. If you are changing upstream code it should be a new > release version, not a reroll. We frequently have problems with other > upstreams doing this and should follow our own guidelines. I'm not bumping the version used for a simple gcc->clang warning fix. That's why I just bumped PORTVERSION. If we want to do a new version, I'll get ahold of the NetBSD people, who also work with keeping a port, and discuss doing that. In this case, it was a simple fix rather than adding a 2 line patch to a files/ directory. > > On 6/3/2013 11:32 AM, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > Author: trhodes (src,doc committer) > > Date: Mon Jun 3 16:32:24 2013 > > New Revision: 319792 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/319792 > > > > Log: > > Update to fix breakage with clang. > > > > PR: 179050 > > Requested by: many > > > > Modified: > > head/sysutils/fsc/Makefile > > head/sysutils/fsc/distinfo > > > > Modified: head/sysutils/fsc/Makefile > > ============================================================================== > > --- head/sysutils/fsc/Makefile Mon Jun 3 16:02:16 2013 (r319791) > > +++ head/sysutils/fsc/Makefile Mon Jun 3 16:32:24 2013 (r319792) > > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ > > > > PORTNAME= fsc > > PORTVERSION= 1.0.1 > > -PORTREVISION= 1 > > +PORTREVISION= 2 > > CATEGORIES= sysutils > > MASTER_SITES= LOCAL > > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= trhodes > > > > Modified: head/sysutils/fsc/distinfo > > ============================================================================== > > --- head/sysutils/fsc/distinfo Mon Jun 3 16:02:16 2013 (r319791) > > +++ head/sysutils/fsc/distinfo Mon Jun 3 16:32:24 2013 (r319792) > > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ > > -SHA256 (fsc-1.0.1.tar.gz) = 3cae8021534dfc7074173ceca0ffd1483c2f58badb28663d6a99bcbf754e1f0a > > -SIZE (fsc-1.0.1.tar.gz) = 11708 > > +SHA256 (fsc-1.0.1.tar.gz) = 41979af3f5ed2fd37e30839cacc22408ac65f2fd20df30de1e5114bc0d2e733b > > +SIZE (fsc-1.0.1.tar.gz) = 12435 > > > > > -- > Regards, > Bryan Drewery > >