Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:53:08 -0500 From: steve <steve@clublinux.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regarding New FreeBSD BenchMark From Sysadmin Mag (left out a fiew tuning options) Message-ID: <3B4E7EB4.B0CF42C7@clublinux.org> References: <20010712211356.D75539@bsd.havk.org> <200107130239.f6D2dFD134165@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <20010712220259.E75539@bsd.havk.org> <3B4E71E2.C67AA458@clublinux.org> <20010712232610.J75539@bsd.havk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Until you've tried both you really > can't make a judgement on way or other. I totally agree. That's exactly why I tried FreeBSD, to see if it lives up to the hype. So far, I'd say it pretty much has for me. > > So what does that say? Not much. Just that I found one case Yep. Besides, we all know VBscript is the best ;-) Steve > > -steve > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B4E7EB4.B0CF42C7>