Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 3 Jul 2011 22:43:48 +0200
From:      Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>
To:        Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] build config(8) on GNU systems
Message-ID:  <CAOfDtXM2mTN87LcVV3Wb7%2ByuJQh6c1CWyAm9Emge5HJ-fTie4g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110703202428.GP71453@hoeg.nl>
References:  <CAOfDtXP-vZ=qDKZuw0P7=NwX5BfUpqqvGsLLrVHTjrnaRjcMhQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110703194908.GO71453@hoeg.nl> <CAGsORuB7HhVrdR6f7O9HSXtQK3egYckgugLqV6PY3M0TDB-Sxg@mail.gmail.com> <20110703202428.GP71453@hoeg.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/7/3 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>:
> * Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com>, 20110703 22:22:
>> Programmers always want to make things "cooler". Just leave the
>> ->d_namlen there :)
>
> Portability isn't achieved by adding #ifdefs, but by writing portable
> code. ;-)

I really don't mind either way.  I hope you two can agree on what's best ;-)

-- 
Robert Millan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOfDtXM2mTN87LcVV3Wb7%2ByuJQh6c1CWyAm9Emge5HJ-fTie4g>