From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 05:27:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB6216A4CE; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 05:27:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.portaone.com (web.portaone.com [195.70.151.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479C043D2D; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 05:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sobomax@web.portaone.com) Received: from www.portaone.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.portaone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j395RdQq098138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 9 Apr 2005 07:27:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sobomax@web.portaone.com) Received: (from sobomax@localhost) by www.portaone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j395RdBW098137; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 07:27:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sobomax) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 07:27:39 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20050409052739.GA97986@www.portaone.com> References: <200504071715.j37HFAdE064344@repoman.freebsd.org> <1112895778.82439.9.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <42557A49.8080203@portaone.com> <200504081018.50959.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504081018.50959.jhb@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/816/Sat Apr 9 02:46:45 2005 on www.portaone.com X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Gavin Atkinson Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 atkbdc.4 src/sys/dev/kbd atkbdc.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 05:27:42 -0000 No, it does not. It was the mistake on the part of the person who was trying to get his new noteebook working. He has made me believe that setting flag to 0x8 doesn't help to solve the problem. -Maxim On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:18:49AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday 07 April 2005 02:22 pm, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > No, it doesn't help. At least not for the ZV5000. > > > > -Maxim > > Does the ZV5000 need the test disabled in more places? Can you narrow down > which places it needs? If so, we can expand the scope of the existing hint. > > -- > John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org > >