Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:26:43 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot <mail25@bzerk.org> To: krad <kraduk@googlemail.com> Cc: Cristiano Deana <cristiano.deana@gmail.com>, "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>, FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Help with setting up a mail server Message-ID: <20100722112643.GA1570@ei.bzerk.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinhQQ_Wt9yhz_I2spTbqQlkrf0g1Vp_iZe1Z86d@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100720092644.28643f19aryeh.friedman%gmail.com@flosoft.no-ip.biz> <AANLkTin-tBrCKAHqs37p3OhafNDNuiajdkTx5XcmTNZ0@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinhQQ_Wt9yhz_I2spTbqQlkrf0g1Vp_iZe1Z86d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:35:48PM +0100, krad typed: > > while we are on the topic of debugging I would recomend exim as an MTA. I > manage a few large enterprise mail systems with 10M + active accounts. A lot > of them are legacy systems that we gained through acquisitions. I generally > have to support them until we can get the accounts migrated onto the main > platform. They are a mixture of exim, postfix, qmail, and sendmail, and > quite often are in a poor state when we first get our hands on them. I have > to say when you are getting mail routing issues exim is by the far the > easiest to debug mainly due to the -bt option. When you combine it with the > debug flag it produced a very detailed output on the mail routing. I have > never found such a feature in all the other MTA's above. Actually, the -bt option comes from sendmail originally ;)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100722112643.GA1570>