Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:00:27 +0000 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: rgrimes@freebsd.org Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-12@freebsd.org, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@freebsd.org>, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r344051 - in stable/12/sbin: newfs tunefs Message-ID: <20190214150027.GB10138@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <201902121631.x1CGVqWE076720@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> References: <CANCZdfoghrVR3uMQM3oqzv31g732iOHJP=iEeO2qD8kbgUwVrw@mail.gmail.com> <201902121631.x1CGVqWE076720@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 08:31:52AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > If all of our process was better documented and laid down > we would have less of this type of discussion on a much less > frequent basis. And much more discussion about how the process is over-specified, onerous, doesn't take care of every edge case, and so forth. I speak from personal knowledge of trying to deal with this during my several years on portmgr@. IMVVHO rules-lawyering is toxic to a volunteer project. It was enough to cause me to walk away from what I had taken on. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190214150027.GB10138>