From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 7 8:28:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu (bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu [128.226.1.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4837C37B400 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 08:28:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from onyx (onyx.cs.binghamton.edu [128.226.140.171]) by bingnet2.cc.binghamton.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g27GSIw01336 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:28:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:26:32 -0500 (EST) From: Zhihui Zhang X-Sender: zzhang@onyx To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: A question of VM page ownership Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there any fundamental reason why a page can not be owned by more than one VM object? If that was the case, the bogus page stuff in vfs_bio.c could be made cleaner IMHO. -Zhihui To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message