From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jul 30  8: 1: 8 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E64E15180
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id QAA58110;
	Fri, 30 Jul 1999 16:59:53 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>,
	freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: replacing grep(1)
References: <19990729182229.E24296@mad> <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907291856100.11776-100000@rac9.wam.umd.edu> <19990729164533.36798@hydrogen.fircrest.net> <xzpyafy1d53.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <xzpwvvi1czq.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <37A1BD1A.59DF842E@newsguy.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 30 Jul 1999 16:59:53 +0200
In-Reply-To: "Daniel C. Sobral"'s message of "Fri, 30 Jul 1999 23:56:26 +0900"
Message-ID: <xzpn1we18uu.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > To be precise, I experience a 30% decrease in system time and a 100%
> > increase in user time when I use RE_STARTEND and eliminate the
> > malloc() / memcpy() calls in procfile().
> Could you please test my patch that removes malloc() but bot
> memcpy()? Here it is again, though against an old version:

Yeah. You can do even better by declaring ln static and never
free()ing it.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message