From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 19 15:44:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C59516A4CE for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 15:44:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D739A43D97 for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 15:44:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4JFhe4w073850; Thu, 19 May 2005 09:43:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:43:53 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050519.094353.120174404.imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20815.1116509187@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20815.1116509187@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why omshell when no dhcpd ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 15:44:10 -0000 In message: <20815.1116509187@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : Why do we have the omshell program in the base system when dhcpd is not : there ? Because you can use it with dhclient. Warner